13 August 2010
US Court of Appeals Rules Against Genocide Deniers
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Wednesday upheld a lower court ruling that prevented the insertion of literature denying the Armenian Genocide into the state school curriculum.
The unanimous opinion written by retired Supreme Court Justice David Souter, sitting on a three judge panel that included Michael Boudin and Jeffery R. Howard of Appeals Court dismissed the Griswold v. Driscoll case, in which plaintiffs were arguing for the inclusion of literature that denied the Armenian Genocide in the Massachusetts state human rights curriculum.
The appeals court said that the Guide on Armenian Genocide instruction “fit into the curriculum classification … [and] that law would not allow the genocide denial actions that the plaintiffs sought.”
30 July 2010
Cameron's Despicable Toadying To Turkey (Eurasia Review)
"It is sadly unsurprising that Prime Minister Cameron's highly publicized trip to Turkey went with no mention of that country's continued denial of the Armenian Genocide, and its suppression of Kurdish and Armenian minorities. Indeed when Turkish leader Erdogan discussed his threats of ethnically cleansing Armenians in the UK, Gordon Brown made no more comment on the matter than if Erdogan had been discussing his favorite television programs."
13 July 2010
The Armenian Genocide and the Turks (Spiegel)
Tigranui Asartyan will be 100 this week. She put away her knives and
forks two years ago, when she lost her sense of taste, and last year she
stopped wearing glasses, having lost her sight. She lives on the
seventh floor of a high-rise building in the Armenian capital Yerevan,
and she hasn't left her room in months. She shivers as the cold
penetrates the gray wool blanket on her lap. "I'm waiting to die," she
says.
Ninety-two years ago, she was waiting in a village in on the Turkish
side of today's border, hiding in the cellar of a house. The body of an
Armenian boy who had been beaten to death lay on the street. Women were
being raped in the house next door, and the eight-year-old girl could
hear them screaming. "There are good and bad Turks," she says. The bad
Turks beat the boy to death, while the good Turks helped her and her
family to flee behind withdrawing Russian troops.
Avadis Demirci, a farmer, is 97. If anyone in his country keeps records on such things, he is probably the last Armenian in Turkey who survived the genocide. Demirci looks out the window at the village of Vakifli, where oleander bushes and tangerine trees are in full bloom. The Mediterranean is visible down the mountain and in the distance.
In July 1915, Turkish police units marched up to the village. "My father strapped me to his back when we fled," says Demirci. "At least that's what my parents told me." Armed with hunting rifles and pistols, the people from his and six other villages dug themselves in on Musa Dagh, or Moses Mountain. Eighteen years later, Austrian writer Franz Werfel described the villagers' armed resistance against the advancing soldiers in his novel "The Forty Days of Musa Dagh."
Read more at www.spiegel.de
Avadis Demirci, a farmer, is 97. If anyone in his country keeps records on such things, he is probably the last Armenian in Turkey who survived the genocide. Demirci looks out the window at the village of Vakifli, where oleander bushes and tangerine trees are in full bloom. The Mediterranean is visible down the mountain and in the distance.
In July 1915, Turkish police units marched up to the village. "My father strapped me to his back when we fled," says Demirci. "At least that's what my parents told me." Armed with hunting rifles and pistols, the people from his and six other villages dug themselves in on Musa Dagh, or Moses Mountain. Eighteen years later, Austrian writer Franz Werfel described the villagers' armed resistance against the advancing soldiers in his novel "The Forty Days of Musa Dagh."
Read more at www.spiegel.de
25 April 2010
26 March 2010
Baroness Cox: British Government should recognise Armenian Genocide
Baroness Cox writes for ePolitix.com ahead of her oral
question on the Armenian Genocide
I am asking HMG whether it will reconsider its position on the recognition of the Armenian Genocide – sadly, without any hope of a change in the British government's consistent policy of refusal to acknowledge the truth.
However, the question is timely for three reasons:
1. The recent recognition by the Swedish Parliament of the state-organised massacres of 1.5 million Armenians by Turkish authorities, beginning in 1915, as genocide – the latest in a long line of Parliaments and other official bodies, such as the Vatican, to do so.
2. The publication last October of 'Was there an Armenian Genocide? Geoffrey Robertson QC's opinion with reference to Foreign and Commonwealth Office documents which show how British ministers, Parliament and people have been misled'.
3. This year marks the 95th anniversary of the beginning of the genocide and recognition is long overdue. Every genocide which remains unrecognised is, in effect, condoned – and can serve as an encouragement to other potential perpetrators of subsequent genocides. This was most infamously illustrated by Hitler's reference to the Armenian Genocide before he embarked on the extension of the Holocaust in Poland: "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"
I am asking HMG whether it will reconsider its position on the recognition of the Armenian Genocide – sadly, without any hope of a change in the British government's consistent policy of refusal to acknowledge the truth.
However, the question is timely for three reasons:
1. The recent recognition by the Swedish Parliament of the state-organised massacres of 1.5 million Armenians by Turkish authorities, beginning in 1915, as genocide – the latest in a long line of Parliaments and other official bodies, such as the Vatican, to do so.
2. The publication last October of 'Was there an Armenian Genocide? Geoffrey Robertson QC's opinion with reference to Foreign and Commonwealth Office documents which show how British ministers, Parliament and people have been misled'.
3. This year marks the 95th anniversary of the beginning of the genocide and recognition is long overdue. Every genocide which remains unrecognised is, in effect, condoned – and can serve as an encouragement to other potential perpetrators of subsequent genocides. This was most infamously illustrated by Hitler's reference to the Armenian Genocide before he embarked on the extension of the Holocaust in Poland: "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"
10 March 2010
Robert Fisk: Living proof of the Armenian genocide
"It's only a small grave, a rectangle of cheap
concrete marking it out, blessed by a flourish of wild yellow lilies.
Inside are the powdered bones and skulls and bits of femur of up to 300
children, Armenian orphans of the great 1915 genocide who died of
cholera and starvation as the Turkish authorities tried to "Turkify"
them in a converted Catholic college high above Beirut. But for once, it
is the almost unknown story of the surviving 1,200 children – between
three and 15 years old – who lived in the crowded dormitory of this
ironically beautiful cut-stone school that proves that the Turks did
indeed commit genocide against the Armenians in 1915."
"Barack Obama and his pliant Secretary of State,
Hillary Clinton – who are now campaigning so pitifully to prevent the US
Congress acknowledging that the Ottoman Turkish massacre of 1.5 million
Armenians was a genocide – should come here to this Lebanese hilltop
village and hang their heads in shame. For this is a tragic, appalling
tale of brutality against small and defenceless children whose families
had already been murdered by Turkish forces at the height of the First
World War, some of whom were to recall how they were forced to grind up
and eat the skeletons of their dead fellow child orphans in order to
survive starvation."
09 March 2010
David Miller on the Armenian Genocide denial in the UK
David Miller, the former
British ambassador to Armenia, was one of the distinguished speakers at
the
London School of Economics screening of "The Blue Book", a British
documentary
about the ongoing Turkish denial of the Armenian Genocide. The film and
discussion drew an audience of over 100 students and staff. Mr Miller was clearly disturbed by the documentary by
Gagik
Karageuzian and the levels at which denial still runs deep in modern day
Turkey.
He engaged the Blue Book issue (a 1916 British parliamentary publication
which
the Turkish government falsely calls a forgery) and summarised Turkish
tactics on
Armenian issues, including the Turkish stance on the recently
signed
Protocols between Yerevan and Ankara, as bullying.
Miller went on to state that he did not think the British Foreign Office would recognise the Armenian Genocide on its own initiative. This was not due to a lack of evidence because, as he suggested, the Foreign Office knew very well about the Armenian Genocide from its own archives. He saw the British non-recognition as part of the sad fact that Great Britain had a record of appeasing dictatorships and powerful states in its national interests.
Miller then gave an example of what he meant. In 1940 over 20,000 Polish prisoners of war and civilians were murdered in cold blood at Katyn forest by Soviet troops on the orders of Joseph Stalin. The Soviets hid these killings, and then blamed the Germans who discovered the corpses in 1943. The British (and Americans), who knew the truth about the Katyn massacre as early as 1940, remained silent about it. It was not until 1990, when the Russian government itself recognised these mass executions by Soviet troops that the British Foreign Office also spoke up.
So, when did the speaker think the Foreign Office might recognise the Armenian Genocide? Only "when Turkey recognises it" was the response.
The screening of "The Blue Book" at the London School of Economics was organised by the LSE SU Armenian Society. The speakers were Lord Avebury, David Miller and Ara Sarafian.
Miller went on to state that he did not think the British Foreign Office would recognise the Armenian Genocide on its own initiative. This was not due to a lack of evidence because, as he suggested, the Foreign Office knew very well about the Armenian Genocide from its own archives. He saw the British non-recognition as part of the sad fact that Great Britain had a record of appeasing dictatorships and powerful states in its national interests.
Miller then gave an example of what he meant. In 1940 over 20,000 Polish prisoners of war and civilians were murdered in cold blood at Katyn forest by Soviet troops on the orders of Joseph Stalin. The Soviets hid these killings, and then blamed the Germans who discovered the corpses in 1943. The British (and Americans), who knew the truth about the Katyn massacre as early as 1940, remained silent about it. It was not until 1990, when the Russian government itself recognised these mass executions by Soviet troops that the British Foreign Office also spoke up.
So, when did the speaker think the Foreign Office might recognise the Armenian Genocide? Only "when Turkey recognises it" was the response.
The screening of "The Blue Book" at the London School of Economics was organised by the LSE SU Armenian Society. The speakers were Lord Avebury, David Miller and Ara Sarafian.
06 March 2010
Robert Fisk: Someone remembers this atrocity at last – to Obama's dismay
Once more we have to forget the Armenian Holocaust – the first of the
20th
century – in order to appease the Turks. Bill Clinton did it.
George W Bush spinelessly caved in to the Turkish generals. And now our
favourite Nobel prize winner – another brave president who promised to
acknowledge the Armenian genocide if he was elected and then declined
to do
so – went whinging and whining to the House Foreign Affairs Committee
in
Washington and pleaded with them not to tell the truth about the
savage rape
and murder of 1.5 million Armenian civilians by the Turks in 1915.
Good for
the committee that it did not give in. But it will do no good.
Sure, the Turkish ambassador has been recalled from Washington in a
huff. But
equally certain is that there will be no vote on the genocide by the
full
House of Representatives. And if there is, there'll never be a vote in
the
Senate. Obama will help see to that. The man who wanted change doesn't
want
change on the little matter of a genocide that led directly to the
Nazi
murder of 6 million Jews.
The events in Washington prove a few things. The Armenian American
community
have a more powerful and wealthier lobby than ever before. More
seriously –
for the Turks – is that this year Turkey did not have the Israeli
lobby
behind it. In the past, Israel, which disgracefully claims that the
Armenian
Holocaust was not a genocide, has supported its close ally Turkey. But
this
year, Israel and Turkey have fallen out and the Israelis are still
miffed at
Turkey's condemnation of the bloodbath in Gaza.
The Turks sent their generals to bully Bush last time round. This time,
the
Turkish Foreign Minister warned that "Turkish-US ties are going
through
a very important phase in which they need strategic co-operation at
the
highest level in their history." The message is simple. Acknowledge
the
genocide, and the US will lose its airbases in Turkey and the Turkish
roads
its military convoys use into Iraq.
The fact, unfortunately, is that these roads are the very highways down
which
the Armenians were sent on their death marches in 1915. That's not
mentioned, of course. Our faithful Turkish ally might even pack up its
support for the US in Afghanistan, where they are helping fight
"Obama's
war". But Robert Gates is still in Washington to remind congressmen
what he said last year; that America needed "those roads and so on".
Well, let's just hope the American troops don't halt their convoys and
dig
in the fields around those roads in the coming years. The skeletons
are
still there in their tens of thousands.
One wonders what would happen if Germany suddenly decided that the Nazi
Holocaust was not a genocide. Would Chancellor Merkel get away with
it?
Would Obama lobby that Germany should be allowed to get away with such
an
obscenity? Perhaps it's worth remembering that in 1939, Hitler asked
his
generals – before setting off into Poland to murder the millions of
Jews in
eastern Europe – a simple question: "Who now remembers the
Armenians?" Well, Hitler got the answer he would have wanted from
Obama
this week.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)