For the past ten years, various Foreign
Office ministers, from Geoff Hoon to Mark Malloch Brown, have told
parliament that "neither this government nor previous governments have
judged that the evidence is sufficiently unequivocal to persuade us
that these events should be categorised as genocide, as defined by the
1948 convention". This would have come as a shock to the architects of
the 1948 UN Convention on Genocide (for whom the Armenian genocide was
second only to the Holocaust), as well as to the wartime British
government, which accused the Turks of proceeding "systematically to
exterminate a whole race out of their domain". (Winston Churchill
described it as "an administrative holocaust . . . there is no
reasonable doubt that this crime was executed for political reasons.)"
10 December 2009
New Statesman: "Genocide denied", Geoffrey Robertson QC
"There are few genocides more clearly established than that suffered
by the Armenians in 1915-16, when half the race was extinguished in
massacres and deportations directed by the Young Turk government. Today
you can be prosecuted in France and other European countries for
denying the slaughter. But the world's most influential genocide denier
- other than Turkey itself - is the British government, which has repeatedly
asserted that there is insufficient evidence that what it terms a
"tragedy" amounted to genocide. Now, thanks to the Freedom of Information
Act, we learn that (in the words of Foreign Office memos) commercial
and political relations with Turkey have required abandoning "the
ethical dimension".